extension of pre-dissertation essay ‘keeping sound natural‘
-recording as a research method
-inevitable translation=change/inauthenticity
-case study? recordings/experiences
-Marleu-Ponty- sensation
-conscious perception/unconscious perception/process of perception
-experience without mediation
-phenomenology
-building formations as a map of the human self
building formations/structures
object placements (people too) within environments and how these change/affect one’s sonic receptions (bounce off)- said objects exist everywhere, and can be anything, depending on the source of sonic information and what is surrounding said source. context is important.
truest ‘ecological consciousness’ found when one is alone (at one?) with their surroundings? sound work as a body – heartbeat/consciousness (organic, ecological/industrial/humanistic [speech etc.] foundation) and then every other element/sound is complimentary/additional, making up a body (work)
‘organic’ sound (born from the spontaneity of your natural surroundings, undisturbed by human interference, untouched when translated into DAW) /sonic heartbeat/foundation (soundscapes/field recordings) – recording equipment as an obstruction/interference within the practice. how problematic is this? does the practice (context/aims are key) then become inherently contradictory? (this does not mean/connote negativity). sustainability – (what the contradictory nature of certain practice means for its future use).
what does ‘true sound’ sound like in 4/5 different, but natural & spontaneous environments with as minimal (or as much depending on aims, but still spontaneous) human interference as possible. – does the spontaneity of obstructions (human or natural) make it (the obstruction) true/authentic? if an obstruction is true/random, (way of the world), then is it a problem, within this context, at all? – (can you have) positive/complimentary sonic interference ? how would one define natural sonic interference? authentic obstruction? sonic inauthenticity – natural interference (ancient trees blocking sound-waves) is no longer interference (if unplanned), therefore becomes part of that heartbeat. planned interference (earmuffs, methodical production/prompting, pre-meditated practice techniques). sound cannot exist within a vacuum, therefore at what point do objects and humans (possible obstructions) become a necessity. at what point do objects/surroundings become obstructions? is interaction (outside/surrounding sources) different from interference/obstruction? negative/positive?
people as noise pollution/objects formation obstructions/blockages (literally, physically in the way of sonic information)- is authentic sonic information only possible when completely undisturbed (not experienced by anyone/left alone)? – unexperienced/absent (from humans) sound as the most true (existent/nonexistent if heard/unheard paradox) – hustle & bustle of the city = (we) as walking obstructions
Rabbit hole- receiver acting as an obstruction/object = where do/can you find the most authentic sonic consciousness/experience without being an obstruction? if not, how do we obstruct in the smallest possible way?
‘at one’ with sound? Consciousness/immersion?